<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for clhs sciblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog</link>
	<description>Musings on current happenings in science from our little slice of the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:49:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Running Barefoot by riesenrr</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/running-barefoot/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>riesenrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=9077#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>One thing that even the original article forgot to mention is how difficult it can be to run barefoot.  If you have ever tried running barefoot, you&#039;ll quickly understand why shoes were invented.  So while native Kenyan runners, who have grown up running barefoot, may run faster than those who wear shoes it is more than likely than the average runner is much slower barefoot than with shoes.  

I thought this was a very intriguing article.  I definitely would have thought that people were faster in shoes than barefoot.  The only problem is that running completely barefoot is near impossible.  There must be almost no obstructions in your path and the path must not be made of asphalt or a black material.  So while running barefoot may be faster scientifically, I doubt that marathon runners will start running barefoot even after this research.

Q 4-4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that even the original article forgot to mention is how difficult it can be to run barefoot.  If you have ever tried running barefoot, you&#8217;ll quickly understand why shoes were invented.  So while native Kenyan runners, who have grown up running barefoot, may run faster than those who wear shoes it is more than likely than the average runner is much slower barefoot than with shoes.  </p>
<p>I thought this was a very intriguing article.  I definitely would have thought that people were faster in shoes than barefoot.  The only problem is that running completely barefoot is near impossible.  There must be almost no obstructions in your path and the path must not be made of asphalt or a black material.  So while running barefoot may be faster scientifically, I doubt that marathon runners will start running barefoot even after this research.</p>
<p>Q 4-4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stars being eaten? by brownng</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/stars-being-eaten/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>brownng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 22:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8855#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Although black holes have a very negative reputation, they keep to themselves for the most part. Once a star wanders too close, the black hole swallows it up. The gravitational force of the hole can rip apart the star before it sucks in the star&#039;s gases, which are then heated from friction and are caused to glow. This is the factor that gives away the black hole&#039;s location. 

Chornock and his colleagues were able to catch an occurrence like this from beginning to end. The brightness flared up and then died away over the course of a year. 

During that year, researchers were able to do plenty of studies on the black hole itself. Along with the location, they were able to detect that its mass is about 3 million times that of the sun&#039;s. They were also able to assume that the star gobbled up by the black hole was in its late red giant stage, which wandered within 1/3 of an astronomical unit of the black hole. 

Scientist Gezari claims that this is the first &quot;space feast&quot; they were able to witness from beginning to end. This gives scientists a huge advantage they didn&#039;t have before. They can now use this information to continue research.

Q4-C-2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although black holes have a very negative reputation, they keep to themselves for the most part. Once a star wanders too close, the black hole swallows it up. The gravitational force of the hole can rip apart the star before it sucks in the star&#8217;s gases, which are then heated from friction and are caused to glow. This is the factor that gives away the black hole&#8217;s location. </p>
<p>Chornock and his colleagues were able to catch an occurrence like this from beginning to end. The brightness flared up and then died away over the course of a year. </p>
<p>During that year, researchers were able to do plenty of studies on the black hole itself. Along with the location, they were able to detect that its mass is about 3 million times that of the sun&#8217;s. They were also able to assume that the star gobbled up by the black hole was in its late red giant stage, which wandered within 1/3 of an astronomical unit of the black hole. </p>
<p>Scientist Gezari claims that this is the first &#8220;space feast&#8221; they were able to witness from beginning to end. This gives scientists a huge advantage they didn&#8217;t have before. They can now use this information to continue research.</p>
<p>Q4-C-2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No sugar for you by brownng</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/no-sugar-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>brownng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=9061#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>A measure of the exact damage a high fructose diet can do goes like this: After a long period of time, the minerals in these kinds of foods make it harder for your brain to learn and remember information. But as you said, eating omega-3 fatty acids can help reduce some of the harm done. 

Along with brain damage, fructose can also cause diabetes, obesity, and fatty liver.

High-fructose corn syrup is a sweetener(six times sweeter than cane sugar) that is added to every day foods such as soft drinks, condiments, applesauce, baby food, and plenty of other processed foods. 

Gomez-Pinilla, a member of UCLA&#039;s Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center clarifies that natural fructose, such as that found in fruits, isn&#039;t a threat, because of the important antioxidants that come along with it.

Researchers did a study of fructose with two groups of lab rats. One group consumed a fructose solution as drinking water for six weeks. The other consumed the same solution for the same amount of time, only these rats also received omega-3 fatty acids in the form of oil and DHA, which helps prevent damage that could be done to the chemicals that allow your brain to learn and remember. 

Before going on these new diets, the rats were trained on a maze twice daily for five days. They observed and recorded how well they were able to navigate their ways through the maze. After the diets, the rats were tested on the maze again. Those that received the DHA were able to make their way through much better than those that didn&#039;t. The fructose had caused their brains to forget their routes.

So, if you&#039;re one to consume high-fructose foods, maybe consuming some omega-3 acids should be high on your priority list.

Q4-C-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A measure of the exact damage a high fructose diet can do goes like this: After a long period of time, the minerals in these kinds of foods make it harder for your brain to learn and remember information. But as you said, eating omega-3 fatty acids can help reduce some of the harm done. </p>
<p>Along with brain damage, fructose can also cause diabetes, obesity, and fatty liver.</p>
<p>High-fructose corn syrup is a sweetener(six times sweeter than cane sugar) that is added to every day foods such as soft drinks, condiments, applesauce, baby food, and plenty of other processed foods. </p>
<p>Gomez-Pinilla, a member of UCLA&#8217;s Brain Research Institute and Brain Injury Research Center clarifies that natural fructose, such as that found in fruits, isn&#8217;t a threat, because of the important antioxidants that come along with it.</p>
<p>Researchers did a study of fructose with two groups of lab rats. One group consumed a fructose solution as drinking water for six weeks. The other consumed the same solution for the same amount of time, only these rats also received omega-3 fatty acids in the form of oil and DHA, which helps prevent damage that could be done to the chemicals that allow your brain to learn and remember. </p>
<p>Before going on these new diets, the rats were trained on a maze twice daily for five days. They observed and recorded how well they were able to navigate their ways through the maze. After the diets, the rats were tested on the maze again. Those that received the DHA were able to make their way through much better than those that didn&#8217;t. The fructose had caused their brains to forget their routes.</p>
<p>So, if you&#8217;re one to consume high-fructose foods, maybe consuming some omega-3 acids should be high on your priority list.</p>
<p>Q4-C-1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 27foot crocodile can eat a human whole? by faustta</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/27foot-crocodile-can-eat-a-human-whole/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>faustta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=9010#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>I found it interesting that crocodiles swallow rocks to help mash up the bones in their stomachs. It is amazing that this crocodile is much larger than the largest living crocodile ever captured by nearly seven feet.Here is the link to the site, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/05/120508-biggest-crocodile-early-humans-science-animals/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it interesting that crocodiles swallow rocks to help mash up the bones in their stomachs. It is amazing that this crocodile is much larger than the largest living crocodile ever captured by nearly seven feet.Here is the link to the site, <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/05/120508-biggest-crocodile-early-humans-science-animals/" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/05/120508-biggest-crocodile-early-humans-science-animals/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Mystery Of Dark Matter Continues by venricch</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/the-mystery-of-dark-matter-continues/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>venricch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8838#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>What is even causing scientists to believe it is there if there is no reliable evidence?  How would the effects and characteristics of dark matter differ from those of matter?  I always have wondered about this topic also.  I hope in the near future astronomers will be able to prove this theory. 

Q4-2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is even causing scientists to believe it is there if there is no reliable evidence?  How would the effects and characteristics of dark matter differ from those of matter?  I always have wondered about this topic also.  I hope in the near future astronomers will be able to prove this theory. </p>
<p>Q4-2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Great Red Spot by venricch</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/the-great-red-spot/comment-page-1/#comment-1224</link>
		<dc:creator>venricch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 21:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8894#comment-1224</guid>
		<description>Wow this is really intriguing! Does this mean Jupiter rotates faster than Earth does? Other planets are always of interest to me and it&#039;s crazy to think a storm on one planet is double the size of Earth.  The great spot will only grow stronger as it continues to contract more clouds into it, causing more energy.

Q4-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow this is really intriguing! Does this mean Jupiter rotates faster than Earth does? Other planets are always of interest to me and it&#8217;s crazy to think a storm on one planet is double the size of Earth.  The great spot will only grow stronger as it continues to contract more clouds into it, causing more energy.</p>
<p>Q4-1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A New Super Earth by sampsobr</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/a-new-super-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>sampsobr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8960#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Based on these findings, there are theories and suspicions of many, many more planets in our Milky Way than anyone ever thought.

I agree that constantly trying to find life on other planets and only coming up with the &#039;possibility of it&#039; on each one is not very productive. However, I think it&#039;s very interesting to see how other planets function, what they&#039;re made of, what their weather is like, etc. I&#039;m sure we will be discovering many new planets in the years to come of space research and exploration.

Q4-1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on these findings, there are theories and suspicions of many, many more planets in our Milky Way than anyone ever thought.</p>
<p>I agree that constantly trying to find life on other planets and only coming up with the &#8216;possibility of it&#8217; on each one is not very productive. However, I think it&#8217;s very interesting to see how other planets function, what they&#8217;re made of, what their weather is like, etc. I&#8217;m sure we will be discovering many new planets in the years to come of space research and exploration.</p>
<p>Q4-1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New football helmets that reduce the risk of concussion by Matt Correia</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/new-football-helmets-that-reduce-the-risk-of-concussion/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Correia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 04:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8927#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>I think that one of the many safety issues is finally being discussed among specialized scientists and doctors. Head trauma. While football is known to be a nasty, hard-hitting sport, it is paramount that player safety is not ignored; even though they make a lot of money. Brain trauma has been career-ending and life threatening over the years, and I believe that making the players&#039; heads more safe through helmets would reduce the risk of these injuries significantly.

I&#039;d like to point something out in the article that I thought was a cool way of testing these helmets. It&#039;s called the STAR Evaluation System, or the Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk. The system pretty much tests each helmet and determines how productive the helmet is as well as how safe it is--which is extremely accurate because they tested it with eight years of football head impacts (1.8 million impacts). I believe a system like the STAR is very important and it can give consumers a company they can trust when buying helmets for their competitors. I hope to see head injury risk decrease and safety to increase for all athletes some day.

Q4- P2 (C1)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of the many safety issues is finally being discussed among specialized scientists and doctors. Head trauma. While football is known to be a nasty, hard-hitting sport, it is paramount that player safety is not ignored; even though they make a lot of money. Brain trauma has been career-ending and life threatening over the years, and I believe that making the players&#8217; heads more safe through helmets would reduce the risk of these injuries significantly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to point something out in the article that I thought was a cool way of testing these helmets. It&#8217;s called the STAR Evaluation System, or the Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk. The system pretty much tests each helmet and determines how productive the helmet is as well as how safe it is&#8211;which is extremely accurate because they tested it with eight years of football head impacts (1.8 million impacts). I believe a system like the STAR is very important and it can give consumers a company they can trust when buying helmets for their competitors. I hope to see head injury risk decrease and safety to increase for all athletes some day.</p>
<p>Q4- P2 (C1)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Physicists Create Great Ball of Fire by kime</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/physicists-create-great-ball-of-fire/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>kime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8849#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>Ryan, you did such a great job. However, if I added some more information on this post, I firmly believe that it would be somewhat better.

It told us that the tank contains two electrodes, and one of which is insulated from the surrounding water by a clay tube. The high voltage causes enormous currents of up to sixty amps - over two hundred times those needed to cause death - to flow through the water for a fraction of a second. Additionally, &quot;The balls survive up to 0.3 seconds after the current is switched off - far longer than normal plasmas, which decay away far more quickly,&quot; says Fussmann. To determine exactly what happens when ball lightning occurs naturally, he hopes to compare the properties of his ball lightning with existing theories about where it comes from. One theory is that the persistent glow is produced by dusty plasma, generated by lightning striking the ground, melting it locally and ejecting fine nano-particles of sand into the atmosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, you did such a great job. However, if I added some more information on this post, I firmly believe that it would be somewhat better.</p>
<p>It told us that the tank contains two electrodes, and one of which is insulated from the surrounding water by a clay tube. The high voltage causes enormous currents of up to sixty amps &#8211; over two hundred times those needed to cause death &#8211; to flow through the water for a fraction of a second. Additionally, &#8220;The balls survive up to 0.3 seconds after the current is switched off &#8211; far longer than normal plasmas, which decay away far more quickly,&#8221; says Fussmann. To determine exactly what happens when ball lightning occurs naturally, he hopes to compare the properties of his ball lightning with existing theories about where it comes from. One theory is that the persistent glow is produced by dusty plasma, generated by lightning striking the ground, melting it locally and ejecting fine nano-particles of sand into the atmosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Folded Solar Panels Produces more Power by riesenrr</title>
		<link>http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/index.php/2012/05/folded-solar-panels-produces-more-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>riesenrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 23:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clhs-chawks.org/sciblog/?p=8836#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>One thing that you forgot to mention was the size of these folds.  They are only microscopic yet still they are able to increase the electricity generation by up to 47 percent.  Also, these new solar panels are made out of plastic while current solar panels are made out of silicon.  Plastic is much more flexible and is less likely to lose its effectiveness after bending.  However, silicon panels can lose up to 70 percent of their energy output after being bent.  

While this improvement in solar energy sounds great in theory, it is not likely to cause such drastic change as mentioned in the second paragraph above.  The average efficiency of a solar panel is only 10 to 15 percent; so if this new solar panel increases the efficiency by 47 percent... the solar panel would only be, at most, 22 percent efficient.  Hardly enough to power a car or be called &quot;a super amazing revelation that will make this earth a better place.&quot;  Another major problem with solar is that the weather isn&#039;t always going to be sunny.  I don&#039;t think cars will ever be able to run on solar energy because I think people will still want to go places when the weather isn&#039;t sunny.  While I appreciate the idea behind solar energy, it is never going to be THE solution to our energy problems since it always has to be paired up with another energy source.

Q 4-3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that you forgot to mention was the size of these folds.  They are only microscopic yet still they are able to increase the electricity generation by up to 47 percent.  Also, these new solar panels are made out of plastic while current solar panels are made out of silicon.  Plastic is much more flexible and is less likely to lose its effectiveness after bending.  However, silicon panels can lose up to 70 percent of their energy output after being bent.  </p>
<p>While this improvement in solar energy sounds great in theory, it is not likely to cause such drastic change as mentioned in the second paragraph above.  The average efficiency of a solar panel is only 10 to 15 percent; so if this new solar panel increases the efficiency by 47 percent&#8230; the solar panel would only be, at most, 22 percent efficient.  Hardly enough to power a car or be called &#8220;a super amazing revelation that will make this earth a better place.&#8221;  Another major problem with solar is that the weather isn&#8217;t always going to be sunny.  I don&#8217;t think cars will ever be able to run on solar energy because I think people will still want to go places when the weather isn&#8217;t sunny.  While I appreciate the idea behind solar energy, it is never going to be THE solution to our energy problems since it always has to be paired up with another energy source.</p>
<p>Q 4-3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

